Supreme Court Decision on the Pledge of Allegiance Case Criticized

Supreme Court Decision on the Pledge of Allegiance Case Criticized

Marci Hamilton has an excellent analysis at Find Law of the US Supreme Court decision in the Pledge of Allegiance Case.

See the LawPundit posting on this topic.

Hamilton – in our opinion correctly – notes that the Supreme Court made a serious error in sticking its nose into local child custody “standing” issues while trying to duck a decision on the proper and nationally significant legal issue of the “standing” of the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance under the Establishment Clause.

Hamilton writes:

“The federal courts, and in fact the federal government, simply do not deal with custody issues except in the rarest circumstances. The majority’s decision was nothing short of hubris when it decided to reach out to determine what Newdow’s rights are with respect to the religious education of his daughter. The folly of this decision could be felt in custody disputes around the nation.”

We agree in many particulars with Hamilton’s reasoning in her superbly written and – in our opinion – logically analyzed article.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: