Why Are There No Arab Democracies? asks Larry Diamond at the Journal of Democracy

Why Are There No Arab Democracies? asks Larry Diamond in the “Twentieth Anniversary Issue” of the Journal of Democracy (January 2010, Volume 21, Number 1).

The Journal of Democracy writes that “Democracy has held its own or gained ground in just about every part of the world except for the Arab Middle East. Why has this crucial region remained such infertile soil for democracy?

Diamond is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University and director of Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law. He is the author of The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World (2008) and is founding coeditor of the Journal of Democracy. He begins his thought-provoking article as follows:

“During democratization’s “third wave,” democracy ceased being a mostly Western phenomenon and “went global.” When the third wave began in 1974, the world had only about 40 democracies, and only a few of them lay outside the West. By the time the Journal of Democracy began publishing in 1990, there were 76 electoral democracies (accounting for slightly less than half the world’s independent states). By 1995, that number had shot up to 117—three in every five states. By then, a critical mass of democracies existed in every major world region save one—the Middle East. Moreover, every one of the world’s major cultural realms had become host to a significant democratic presence, albeit again with a single exception—the Arab world. Fifteen years later, this exception still stands.

The continuing absence of even a single democratic regime in the Arab world is a striking anomaly—the principal exception to the globalization of democracy. Why is there no Arab democracy?”

Read the article here.

BuzzMachine : Davos 2010 : Replace the Old Order?


“The theme of this year’s World Economic Forum meeting at Davos was “rethink, redesign, rebuild.” When a friend recited that list for me, I responded that given the institutions there, the more appropriate slogan is “replace….

The World Economic Forum actually does an admirable job trying to push its members into [the] future.

But one must wonder whether they can go fast enough — given this crowd’s resistance to change — and thus whether they are helping the right people.”

U.S. Sentencing Commission Proposes Reduced Criminal Penalties for Corporations having Compliance Programs | WSJ Law Blog

In Federal Agency Proposes Reduced Criminal Penalties for Corporations at the WSJ Law Blog, Amir Efrati writes:

“What kind of penalties should companies face when their employees commit crimes?

[T]he U.S. Sentencing Commission … last week included a proposal in this 78-page document to reduce exposure by organizations whose employees engage in criminal behavior….

Under the proposal, highlighted in today’s [January 29, 2010] WSJ story, corporations could receive credit during sentencing if they have compliance programs designed to combat white-collar crime….

The proposal, which the commission has released for public comment, would reduce fines and penalties even if high-level company officers were involved in the criminal activity.”

Applying criminal penalties to white-collar crime by employees of corporations has never been very successful and can lead to disastrous results, such as in the case of Arthur Andersen LLP, which ultimately went out of business due to a criminal prosecution for destruction of evidence that cost “thousands of jobs”. As written at the previously cited WSJ story by Gary Fields:

“Changing how corporations are handled in criminal cases is one of the commission’s priorities this session, and the proposal tackles a controversial area of law. After the corporate accounting scandals in the early 2000s, the Department of Justice prosecuted a number of companies, including Enron’s accountant, Andersen LLP. The conviction, though overturned later by the Supreme Court, put the company out of business, resulting in thousands of jobs lost. “

The issue involved here is important for law, touching again upon the inexorable question of the limits of the criminal sanction. As we have written previously at LawPundit:

Who out there in the American criminal justice system understands the basic wisdom found in Herbert Packer‘s Limits of the Criminal Sanction? What lawmaker, government official, judge, prosecutor, or prison official in the United States has ever read Packer’s book – much less applied the inexorable legal policy conclusions demanded by it? (see Google Books, this PPT and Packer’s Two Models of the Criminal Process)

Not every undesirable human action or activity in society is or should be subject to criminal punishments. There are other – more modern – means available to deal with socially undesirable behavior.“

What about the barbaric system of handcuffs for white-collar crimes? Totally unnecessary.
We wrote previously at LawPundit:

“[E]xecutives being carted away in handcuffs – what is the point of this barbaric government behavior – have the authorities seen too many Westerns on TV? Handcuffs are for dangerous violent persons, not for white-collar circumstantial crimes. The whole image is terrible for the entire justice system. It is terrible for America. Land of the free? Model for the world? Hardly. Forget that myth. “Prison Justice” and the “binding of the hands of prisoners” (just look at ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs ) has been known since antiquity – there are better, more modern and humane solutions.] “

The proposals of the U.S. Sentencing Commission unfortunately retain the implicit assumption that “criminal penalties” and “internal government control” are the most advisable ways to deal with white-collar crime in corporations, whereas there is simply no empirical evidence anywhere that such an assumption is accurate.

We suspect that any good economist will tell the lawmakers and regulators that white-collar crimes are economic by nature and should be penalized in due course by economic sanctions, rather than by primitive barbaric criminal incarceration and the like.

Arianna Huffington: Davos Diary 2010: Snapshots from My Short But Sweet Visit

Arianna Huffington: Davos Diary 2010: Snapshots from My Short But Sweet Visit

“Things got off to an interesting start before I even arrived. I happened to be on the same flight from D.C. to Zurich as Larry Summers, who was reading Martin Jacques’ weighty tome, ‘When China Rules the World. His review: ‘Interesting…and disturbing.'”

Davos Conversation’s Universe (801)

World Economic Forum 2010 Ends

World Economic Forum – Home

“At the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2010 in Davos, participants resolved to rethink, redesign and rebuild the global economy to ensure principled growth and sustainability.”

The future of legal education? SIMPLE. SIMulated Professional Learning Environment.

Paul Maharg of Zeugma in his draft document at SlideShare titled The permeable web: community, value and ethics in legal education, discusses SIMPLE – SIMulated Professional Learning Environment – in its application to law studies.

Maharg writes:

“Draft paper. Do not quote without permission of author.

The discussion of an innovative simulation is really a discussion about what legal education can be. “